吴文灿_好大夫在线
微信扫码

微信扫码关注医生

有问题随时问

综合推荐热度 3.7

在线服务满意度 暂无

在线问诊量 870

左箭头 返回医生主页 门诊信息 患者投票 科普文章 患者问诊 心意礼物 患友会
吴文灿

吴文灿

主任医师 教授
左箭头 返回医生主页 门诊信息 患者投票 科普文章 患者问诊 心意礼物 患友会

论文精选

Primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis by endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone intubation guided by a soft probe

发表者:吴文灿 1105人已读

PURPOSE: To investigate the suitability of cold steel endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EES-DCR) with circular bicanalicular intubation with silicone tubes (CBIST) guided by a soft probe for the primary treatment of acute purulent dacryocystitis (APD).

DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, interventional case series.温州医科大学附属眼视光医院眼科吴文灿

PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two patients (59 females, 13 males) with a median presenting age of 55+/-12 years (range, 28-71 years).

METHODS: Eighty-four patients with unilateral APD were equally and randomly divided into 2 groups. Cold steel EES-DCR was performed after the lacrimal abscess formation, and external dacryocystorhinostomy (E-DCR) was performed 1 to 2 weeks after resolution of the acute inflammation. In both groups, CBIST guided by a soft probe was performed and the silicone tubes were kept in the lacrimal passages for 3 months. Postoperative follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. Outcomes were compared between both groups, considering resolution time for external acute inflammation, success rate of free lacrimal passage reconstruction, and lack of complications as indicators of treatment suitability.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time for resolution of the external acute inflammation, success rate of free lacrimal passage reconstruction, and complications.

RESULTS: In this study, complete postoperative data were acquired from 40 patients in the EES-DCR group and from 32 patients in the E-DCR group, and the outcomes were compared. Acute inflammation resolved more quickly in the EES-DCR group than in the E-DCR group (P<0.05). Ostium patency at 12 months after silicone tube removal was achieved in significantly more patients in the EES-DCR group (36/40 [90%]) than in the E-DCR group (21/32 [65.7%]; P<0.01). In the EES-DCR group, lacrimal passage reconstruction failed because of intranasal ostial closure in 3 patients and because of common canaliculus obstruction in 1 patient. In the E-DCR group, lacrimal passage reconstruction failed because of intranasal ostial closure in 3 patients, lacrimal sac fibrosis, granulation, or both in 6 patients, and common canaliculus obstruction in 2 patients. Other than the slight laceration of the inferior puncta, no significant complications arose from the treatments.

CONCLUSIONS: Cold steel EES-DCR with CBIST guided by a soft probe is a promising alternative for the primary treatment of APD with abscess formation.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

注:该文发表于Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):116-22.(眼科学临床论文SCI影响因子最高杂志)

问医生

图文问诊开始

×
分享到微信
打开微信“扫一扫”,即可分享该文章

发表于:2011-03-07 21:21

吴文灿大夫的信息

  • 感谢信: 0 感谢信 礼物: 0 礼物

网上咨询吴文灿大夫

吴文灿的咨询范围: 神经眼科疾病, 眼眶疾病, 泪道疾病, 无, 全国各地

咨询吴文灿大夫